2-9 公正な比較のレビューは系統的である必要があります

系統的な方法を用いていないレビューは、組み入れのための試験の選択が偏っていたり、その方法が一部の試験では認められなかったりするため、治療効果の偏りや不正確な推定値につながる可能性があります。さらに、一部の試験の評価に偏りがある、または選択された試験の結果の統合が不十分あるいは不適切な可能性もあります。

決定の際の参考にするためには、できる限り、治療の公正な比較の非系統的レビューではなく、公正な比較の系統的レビューを用いてください。

Browse by Key Concept

Back to Learning Resources home

Filter these resources:

Clear Filters

Logo

Bias

A University of Massachusetts Medical School text on biases.

| 0 Comments

Sunn Skepsis

Denne portalen er ment å gi deg som pasient råd om kvalitetskriterier for helseinformasjon og tilgang til forskningsbasert informasjon.

| 0 Comments

Dodgy academic PR

Ben Goldacre: 58% of all press releases by academic institutions lacked relevant cautions and caveats about the methods and results reported

| 0 Comments

The Systematic Review

This blog explains what a systematic review is, the steps involved in carrying one out, and how the review should be structured.

| 0 Comments

Goldilocks

Cartoon and blog about how poorly performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses may misrepresent the truth.

| 0 Comments
Book cover

Stroke

Another example of unnecessary research, yet again because the results of preceding studies had not been gathered together and analyzed, […]

| 2 Comments
Book cover

Is one study ever enough?

The simple answer is ‘hardly ever’. Very seldom will one fair treatment comparison yield sufficiently reliable evidence on which to […]

| 1 Comment

No Resources Found

Try clearing your filters or selecting different ones.